Skip to main content

DIFFERENT LAW ENTRANCES IN WHICH A LAW ASPIRANT CAN APPEAR

Question

In how many different Law Entrance Exams , a law aspirant can appear ? 

Answer

There are several law entrance tests taken for the undergraduate and post-graduate law courses like the 5-year BA-LLB integrated course, 5-year BBA-LLB integrated course, 3-year LLB course, 3-year LLM course, etc. The different law entrance tests that are held are CLAT (Common Law Admission Test), AILET (All India Law Entrance Test), LSAT (Law School Admission Test), DU-LLB Entrance Test (For admission to Delhi University Law courses), SLAT , BHU , PU.LLB , JMI ,MH CET 


All the entrance exams are mostly similar to each other and have similar syllabus and patterns. 75% Syllabus is same for all the Law entrances

The scores of these entrance exams are responsible for admission to different universities.

By - Knowledge Nation Law Centre - Best CLAT coaching in Delhi - Best LLB coaching in delhi 

Visit - www.knowledgenation.co.in

Call - 9999882757 / 9999882858 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Knowledge Nation Law Centre created soo many results in Past years | Success story of KNLC

Success story of   Knowledge Nation Law Centre  -  Best CLAT coaching In Delhi Started in the year 2011 , KNLC has trained more than 11000 law aspirants in past years. & Has maintained the legacy of producing maximum no of selections by single educational institution from last 5 years   Because of results of  KNLC  , it has been awarded several awards in past years. How results are made  1) 75 worksheets program (LAST 15 years questions that too topic wise & type wise arranged ) of each topic. 2) Expert Faculty of each and every subject , a team of 28 Faculties. 3) Comprehensive Study material designed by law team. 4) Workbooks of every topic give extra competitive advantage over other candidates. 5) Mandatory Revision Classes after the course completion.  6) Updated test series - Chapter wise tests , Module wise test & Full detailed Syllabus tests in accordance with the latest pattern. 7) Doubt solving Helpline & ...
3 comments
Read more

100 Important Legal Maxims for CLAT Exam By Knowledge Nation Law Centre

100 Important Legal Maxims for CLAT Exam Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea – An act does not make a person guilty unless there is a guilty mind. Audi alteram partem – Hear the other side. Nemo judex in causa sua – No one should be a judge in his own case. Volenti non fit injuria – To a willing person, no injury is done. Res ipsa loquitur – The thing speaks for itself. Ignorantia juris non excusat – Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Injuria sine damno – Legal injury without actual damage. Damnum sine injuria – Damage without legal injury. Qui facit per alium facit per se – He who acts through another does the act himself. Ubi jus ibi remedium – Where there is a right, there is a remedy. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus – False in one thing, false in everything. Salus populi suprema lex – Welfare of the people is the supreme law. Caveat emptor – Let the buyer beware. Caveat venditor – Let the seller beware. Ex t...
1 comment
Read more

CLAT 2025 : Delhi High Court Finds Two Answers 'Demonstrably Wrong', Directs To Revise Results Of Petitioner

The Delhi High Court has ruled that courts shouldn't take a completely hands-off approach when it comes to correcting errors in answer keys, especially when those errors are clearly wrong. Justice Jyoti Singh emphasized that courts have the power to review and challenge answer keys, even if expert opinions are involved. In a recent case, a candidate challenged the final answer key for the CLAT-UG 2025 exam, specifically questioning five answers. The court found errors in two of those questions and decided that ignoring those mistakes would be unfair to the candidate and potentially affect other candidates' results. As a result, the court ordered that the candidate's result be revised to award marks for one of the incorrectly answered questions. Additionally, the court excluded another question from the exam, as recommended by an expert committee. The Consortium of NLUs had argued that their expert committee had thoroughly reviewed all objections before finalizing the answer...
Post a Comment
Read more