Skip to main content

Landmark Supreme Court Judgements for LAW Entrances

Topic - Supreme Court Landmark Judgements 

Quick Read / Learn for Law Entrances 

Here are some landmark Supreme Court judgments in India, in detail, point wise

_Fundamental Rights_

1. _A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950)_: Defined the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Liberty)

2. _State of West Bengal v. Subodh Gopal Bose (1951)_: Established the principle of "procedure established by law" under Article 21

3. _Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)_: Held that the basic structure of the Constitution is unamendable

_Equality and Social Justice_

1. _State of Punjab v. Jalal Singh (1966)_: Struck down the Punjab Act, which allowed for preventive detention

2. _Golak Nath v. State of Punjab (1967)_: Held that Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights

3. _Indira Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)_: Upheld the Mandal Commission's recommendations for reservation

_Separation of Powers_

1. _Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab (1955)_: Established the principle of judicial review

2. _S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)_: Held that the Governor's discretion is subject to judicial review

_Environmental Law_

1. _M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1986)_: Established the principle of absolute liability for environmental damage

2. _Vellore Citizens' Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996)_: Held that the precautionary principle applies to environmental protection

_Gender Justice_

1. _Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)_: Established guidelines for sexual harassment at the workplace

2. _Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)_: Decriminalized consensual homosexual relationships

_Other notable judgments_

1. _Bhim Singh v. Union of India (1986)_: Held that the right to free legal aid is a fundamental right

2. _Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)_: Established the principle of "due process" under Article 21

3. _S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981)_: Held that the judiciary has the power to appoint commissions of inquiry

Call - 9999882757 / 9999882858 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Knowledge Nation Law Centre created soo many results in Past years | Success story of KNLC

Success story of   Knowledge Nation Law Centre  -  Best CLAT coaching In Delhi Started in the year 2011 , KNLC has trained more than 11000 law aspirants in past years. & Has maintained the legacy of producing maximum no of selections by single educational institution from last 5 years   Because of results of  KNLC  , it has been awarded several awards in past years. How results are made  1) 75 worksheets program (LAST 15 years questions that too topic wise & type wise arranged ) of each topic. 2) Expert Faculty of each and every subject , a team of 28 Faculties. 3) Comprehensive Study material designed by law team. 4) Workbooks of every topic give extra competitive advantage over other candidates. 5) Mandatory Revision Classes after the course completion.  6) Updated test series - Chapter wise tests , Module wise test & Full detailed Syllabus tests in accordance with the latest pattern. 7) Doubt solving Helpline & ...
3 comments
Read more

100 Important Legal Maxims for CLAT Exam By Knowledge Nation Law Centre

100 Important Legal Maxims for CLAT Exam Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea – An act does not make a person guilty unless there is a guilty mind. Audi alteram partem – Hear the other side. Nemo judex in causa sua – No one should be a judge in his own case. Volenti non fit injuria – To a willing person, no injury is done. Res ipsa loquitur – The thing speaks for itself. Ignorantia juris non excusat – Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Injuria sine damno – Legal injury without actual damage. Damnum sine injuria – Damage without legal injury. Qui facit per alium facit per se – He who acts through another does the act himself. Ubi jus ibi remedium – Where there is a right, there is a remedy. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus – False in one thing, false in everything. Salus populi suprema lex – Welfare of the people is the supreme law. Caveat emptor – Let the buyer beware. Caveat venditor – Let the seller beware. Ex t...
1 comment
Read more

CLAT 2025 : Delhi High Court Finds Two Answers 'Demonstrably Wrong', Directs To Revise Results Of Petitioner

The Delhi High Court has ruled that courts shouldn't take a completely hands-off approach when it comes to correcting errors in answer keys, especially when those errors are clearly wrong. Justice Jyoti Singh emphasized that courts have the power to review and challenge answer keys, even if expert opinions are involved. In a recent case, a candidate challenged the final answer key for the CLAT-UG 2025 exam, specifically questioning five answers. The court found errors in two of those questions and decided that ignoring those mistakes would be unfair to the candidate and potentially affect other candidates' results. As a result, the court ordered that the candidate's result be revised to award marks for one of the incorrectly answered questions. Additionally, the court excluded another question from the exam, as recommended by an expert committee. The Consortium of NLUs had argued that their expert committee had thoroughly reviewed all objections before finalizing the answer...
Post a Comment
Read more