Skip to main content

How Knowledge Nation Law Centre became BEST LLB coaching institute of India

Success story of Knowledge Nation Law Centre

How KNLC , became Rank 1 coaching institute for LLB & How it maintained legacy of producing 100 % results from last 7 years consecutively


1) Regular Classes with well designed tips & tricks according to the demand of Exam.

2) A lot of practice from the question bank of each & every topic to Crack LAW ENTRANCE

3) Well equipped Audio Visual technology in the classrooms for better understanding.

4) Comprehensive study material designed by the team of experts to Crack CLAT | AILET | LLB | LSAT in 1st attempt. 

5) Bullet notes of each topic in printed format. 

6) Topic wise test | Module wise test & Full detailed syllabus mock test series to analyze the preparation.  

7) Doubt sessions from the law experts. 

8) Legal GK & Advance legal GK notes in Printed format. 

9) 2 times Revision of the entire course before going for the exam. 

These are some of the benefits of joining INDIA'S BEST CLAT & LLB COACHING INSTITUTE


📞 +91-9999882757 / +91-9999882858 




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Knowledge Nation Law Centre created soo many results in Past years | Success story of KNLC

Success story of   Knowledge Nation Law Centre  -  Best CLAT coaching In Delhi Started in the year 2011 , KNLC has trained more than 11000 law aspirants in past years. & Has maintained the legacy of producing maximum no of selections by single educational institution from last 5 years   Because of results of  KNLC  , it has been awarded several awards in past years. How results are made  1) 75 worksheets program (LAST 15 years questions that too topic wise & type wise arranged ) of each topic. 2) Expert Faculty of each and every subject , a team of 28 Faculties. 3) Comprehensive Study material designed by law team. 4) Workbooks of every topic give extra competitive advantage over other candidates. 5) Mandatory Revision Classes after the course completion.  6) Updated test series - Chapter wise tests , Module wise test & Full detailed Syllabus tests in accordance with the latest pattern. 7) Doubt solving Helpline & ...
3 comments
Read more

Landmark Supreme Court Judgements for LAW Entrances

Topic - Supreme Court Landmark Judgements  Quick Read / Learn for Law Entrances  Here are some landmark Supreme Court judgments in India, in detail, point wise _Fundamental Rights_ 1. _A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950)_: Defined the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Liberty) 2. _State of West Bengal v. Subodh Gopal Bose (1951)_: Established the principle of "procedure established by law" under Article 21 3. _Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)_: Held that the basic structure of the Constitution is unamendable _Equality and Social Justice_ 1. _State of Punjab v. Jalal Singh (1966)_: Struck down the Punjab Act, which allowed for preventive detention 2. _Golak Nath v. State of Punjab (1967)_: Held that Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights 3. _Indira Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)_: Upheld the Mandal Commission's recommendations for reservation _Separation of Powers_ 1. _Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab (1955)_: Established the principle of jud...
Post a Comment
Read more

CLAT 2025 : Delhi High Court Finds Two Answers 'Demonstrably Wrong', Directs To Revise Results Of Petitioner

The Delhi High Court has ruled that courts shouldn't take a completely hands-off approach when it comes to correcting errors in answer keys, especially when those errors are clearly wrong. Justice Jyoti Singh emphasized that courts have the power to review and challenge answer keys, even if expert opinions are involved. In a recent case, a candidate challenged the final answer key for the CLAT-UG 2025 exam, specifically questioning five answers. The court found errors in two of those questions and decided that ignoring those mistakes would be unfair to the candidate and potentially affect other candidates' results. As a result, the court ordered that the candidate's result be revised to award marks for one of the incorrectly answered questions. Additionally, the court excluded another question from the exam, as recommended by an expert committee. The Consortium of NLUs had argued that their expert committee had thoroughly reviewed all objections before finalizing the answer...
Post a Comment
Read more