Skip to main content

NLSIU - NLU BENGALURU - 3 Year LLB - Pattern Overview


NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY – NLU BENGALURU – 3 YEAR – LLB (EXAM PATTERN)

MAXIMUM MARKS – 150      [(WRITTEN – 140 MARKS) + (INTERVIEW – 10 MARKS)]

 WRITTEN (140 MARKS) 

PART A – 75 MARKS (MCQ BASED) 
• ENGLISH COMPREHENSION – 25 MARKS
• CURRENT AFFAIRS – 25 MARKS 
• REASONING (LOGICAL & LEGAL) – 25 MARKS 

NOTE – If the candidate qualifies PART A, then only PART B will be checked. Marks of PART A will not be calculated for MERIT LIST 

PART B – 65 MARKS (WRITTEN) – ARTICLE WRITING 
• LEGAL (50 MARKS) - 10 QUESTIONS OF 5 MARKS EACH (WORD LIMIT WILL BE ACCORDING TO QUESTION) 
• CURRENT AFFAIRS (15 MARKS) – 1 QUESTION OF 15 MARKS (500 WORD ARTICLE)

Note – MARKS OF PART B WILL BE CALCULATED FOR MERIT LIST & FOR INTERVIEW SELECTION PURPOSE 
 
INTERVIEW (10 MARKS) 
GENERAL INTERVIEW ON ANY TOPIC 
NOTE – GENERAL INTRODUCTION + CURRENT AFFAIRS BASED


Comments

  1. AB Tutorials - Best CLAT Coaching Institute in Delhi16 May 2023 at 14:00

    I am very much pleased that I landed on your blog. It is a very interesting and informative post, I must say. That said, I would like to let you know that, AB Tutorials offers the best CLAT coaching in Delhi. Law aspirants looking forward for proper guidance and assistance in the preparation of law exams can join AB Tutorials.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Knowledge Nation Law Centre created soo many results in Past years | Success story of KNLC

Success story of   Knowledge Nation Law Centre  -  Best CLAT coaching In Delhi Started in the year 2011 , KNLC has trained more than 11000 law aspirants in past years. & Has maintained the legacy of producing maximum no of selections by single educational institution from last 5 years   Because of results of  KNLC  , it has been awarded several awards in past years. How results are made  1) 75 worksheets program (LAST 15 years questions that too topic wise & type wise arranged ) of each topic. 2) Expert Faculty of each and every subject , a team of 28 Faculties. 3) Comprehensive Study material designed by law team. 4) Workbooks of every topic give extra competitive advantage over other candidates. 5) Mandatory Revision Classes after the course completion.  6) Updated test series - Chapter wise tests , Module wise test & Full detailed Syllabus tests in accordance with the latest pattern. 7) Doubt solving Helpline & ...
3 comments
Read more

100 Important Legal Maxims for CLAT Exam By Knowledge Nation Law Centre

100 Important Legal Maxims for CLAT Exam Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea – An act does not make a person guilty unless there is a guilty mind. Audi alteram partem – Hear the other side. Nemo judex in causa sua – No one should be a judge in his own case. Volenti non fit injuria – To a willing person, no injury is done. Res ipsa loquitur – The thing speaks for itself. Ignorantia juris non excusat – Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Injuria sine damno – Legal injury without actual damage. Damnum sine injuria – Damage without legal injury. Qui facit per alium facit per se – He who acts through another does the act himself. Ubi jus ibi remedium – Where there is a right, there is a remedy. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus – False in one thing, false in everything. Salus populi suprema lex – Welfare of the people is the supreme law. Caveat emptor – Let the buyer beware. Caveat venditor – Let the seller beware. Ex t...
Post a Comment
Read more

CLAT 2025 : Delhi High Court Finds Two Answers 'Demonstrably Wrong', Directs To Revise Results Of Petitioner

The Delhi High Court has ruled that courts shouldn't take a completely hands-off approach when it comes to correcting errors in answer keys, especially when those errors are clearly wrong. Justice Jyoti Singh emphasized that courts have the power to review and challenge answer keys, even if expert opinions are involved. In a recent case, a candidate challenged the final answer key for the CLAT-UG 2025 exam, specifically questioning five answers. The court found errors in two of those questions and decided that ignoring those mistakes would be unfair to the candidate and potentially affect other candidates' results. As a result, the court ordered that the candidate's result be revised to award marks for one of the incorrectly answered questions. Additionally, the court excluded another question from the exam, as recommended by an expert committee. The Consortium of NLUs had argued that their expert committee had thoroughly reviewed all objections before finalizing the answer...
Post a Comment
Read more